30% of this year's review articls have a link to an incentive to someone who gives a great review. Rewards should be applicable and fungible across publishers, as well as transparent and clear to users. @svenfund #CCIB23 #PeerReview #scholarlypublishing #research pic.twitter.com/9g8Xm9Iwer— Charleston Hub (@chsconf) September 6, 2023
30% of this year's review articls have a link to an incentive to someone who gives a great review. Rewards should be applicable and fungible across publishers, as well as transparent and clear to users. @svenfund #CCIB23 #PeerReview #scholarlypublishing #research pic.twitter.com/9g8Xm9Iwer
